For companies
Finding Creators: 7 problems for companies and their solutions
Finding Creators costs companies time and creates briefing, rights and quality risks. Seven problems and a structured solution.
- Author
- Klaas Wibker
- Published
- Updated
- Reading time
- 9-minute read

Short answer
The short version
- Creator sourcing becomes expensive when discovery, briefs, rights and review take place in separate tools.
- Reach replaces neither brand fit nor clear acceptance criteria.
- UGC production and distribution in a Creator's feed are different services.
- A pilot should define its objective, remuneration, rights and performance measurement before casting.
Finding external Creators initially sounds like a discovery task. In practice, the problem starts afterwards: who really fits the brand? What should be produced? Who may use the content later? And how can the company tell whether the agreed service was delivered? When these answers live in DMs, spreadsheets and individual contracts, a campaign quickly becomes an operations project.
The seven biggest problems when finding Creators
- 1. Discovery is spread across many channelsRecommendations, agency lists, platform searches and direct messages rarely produce a shared, comparable candidate pool.
- 2. Reach is confused with brand fitFollower counts reveal neither whether a Creator can explain the product credibly nor whether tone, audience and production quality fit.
- 3. Briefs cannot be verifiedCreative concepts help, but do not replace mandatory statements, prohibited elements, formats and clear acceptance criteria.
- 4. Remuneration and rights are mixed togetherProduction, an own-profile post, organic reuse, paid usage and whitelisting are different services with different values.
- 5. Compliance is checked too lateAdvertising disclosure and brand requirements belong in the brief and acceptance review, not only in later damage control.
- 6. Submissions are difficult to compareWithout consistent status and review logic, every post triggers a new discussion even though the campaign should use the same rules.
- 7. Performance remains an assumptionA published post is not yet a campaign result. Companies must decide beforehand whether they are buying assets, publication, views, clicks or sales.
Five ways to find external Creators
First clarify whether you need new footage or want to distribute existing footage. For approved clips, clipping through Creator profiles is an option. The task and permitted edits are in the campaign brief.
| Model | Advantage | Typical disadvantage | Suitable for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct outreach | Personal contact and flexible negotiation | High manual effort; knowledge stays in DMs | Specific preferred Creators |
| Influencer agency | Strategy, network and support | Higher costs and less self-service control | Large managed campaigns |
| UGC marketplace | Rapid production of many assets | Distribution and rights differ considerably | Content for brand channels and ads |
| Freelancer platform | Wide range of production skills | Own social reach is rarely central to the model | Individual photo, video or editing commissions |
| Performance Creator marketplace | Campaign, remuneration and performance in one process | Requires active Creators and reliable measurement | Repeatable campaigns on real profiles |
None of these models is inherently superior. Anyone needing only five product videos should not build a reach-based campaign. Anyone seeking visibility in real communities, however, must not confuse UGC production with distribution.
From an open brief to verifiable requirements
A good brief has two levels. The creative level describes the idea, tone and desired effect. The verifiable level contains format, length, mandatory statements, disclosures, prohibited elements, deadlines and required evidence. Only the second level can be assessed consistently; the first still needs human judgement.
Commission content or distribute it through Creator profiles?
With UGC production, the company primarily buys an asset. A post in the Creator's feed adds distribution. If the brand wants to use the post as an ad later, it needs additional rights. Separating these three levels in the campaign draft makes offers easier to compare fairly and prevents later rights conflicts.
Which remuneration suits which objective?
| Objective | Suitable model | Main control point |
|---|---|---|
| Defined asset | Fixed fee | Deliverables and usage rights |
| Multiple quality levels | Milestones | Objective thresholds and acceptance |
| Measurable reach | CPM with a limit | Definition of views and budget limit |
| Production plus performance | Hybrid | Clearly separate fixed and variable components |
The contentmarkt process in seven steps
- The company creates a private campaign draft.
- Budget framework, duration and remuneration model are defined.
- Creative brief and verifiable requirements are recorded separately.
- The campaign becomes visible to suitable Creators.
- Creators choose voluntarily, connect a profile and submit content.
- Submissions are checked against rules and documented signals.
- Views are checked within the defined limits before settlement.
This workflow describes product logic, not a guarantee of a particular number of active Creators, automatic measurement on every platform or economic campaign success. External APIs, approvals and marketplace availability remain real dependencies.
Checklist for the first pilot campaign
- One objectiveChoose primarily assets, reach, clicks or sales.
- One Creator profileDescribe topical fit and community rather than only a follower count.
- A clear rights packageSeparate posting, reuse, paid usage, whitelisting and editing.
- Verifiable rulesDefine mandatory statements, prohibited elements and advertising disclosure before launch.
- A budget limitDefine the maximum remuneration and how performance is measured.
Which platform suits which sourcing model is covered in our comparison of contentmarkt and seven competitors. The other market perspective is covered in the article about the seven problems faced by small Creators.
FAQ
Common questions
Where can companies find suitable Creators?
Possible routes include direct outreach, agencies, UGC marketplaces, freelancer platforms and performance Creator marketplaces. The best choice depends on whether content production, reach or support is the priority.
What belongs in a good Creator brief?
Objective, audience, format, mandatory statements, prohibited elements, disclosures, acceptance criteria, timeline, remuneration and usage rights should be clearly described separately.
Commission UGC or post on Creator profiles?
UGC production supplies assets for brand channels. Posts in a Creator's feed additionally provide distribution and community context. Both goals can be combined, but need different rights and metrics.
When is an agency better than a marketplace?
An agency fits better when strategy, casting, negotiation and production should be fully outsourced. A marketplace fits repeatable self-service campaigns with clear rules.
Primary sources
Sources and date checked
Product details were checked on 6 September 2026. Providers can change their terms at any time.